Monitoring Results Analysis of Shudi Slope Project

Volume 8, Issue 1, February 2024     |     PP. 1-11      |     PDF (3108 K)    |     Pub. Date: November 7, 2024
DOI: 10.54647/geosciences170330    23 Downloads     1332 Views  

Author(s)

Jianying Wang, School of Engineering, Yunnan College of Business Management, Kunming, China
Dewu Huang, City College, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China

Abstract
The monitoring results of the Shudi landslide indicate that the maximum surface displacement of the slope deformation reaches over 30cm, and the deformation accounted for about 40% of the total deformation in 2019. The annual change rate decreased from 120mm/a in 2019 to 20mm/a in 2022. Although it is still continuing, the slope deformation shows a convergence trend; The longitudinal displacement of the slope is obvious between 1/4 to 3/4, and the displacement direction all points towards the river center, indicating the possibility of overall landslide and shear landslide.

Keywords
slope; deformation; monitoring; shear

Cite this paper
Jianying Wang, Dewu Huang, Monitoring Results Analysis of Shudi Slope Project , SCIREA Journal of Geosciences. Volume 8, Issue 1, February 2024 | PP. 1-11. 10.54647/geosciences170330

References

[ 1 ] Osasan, K. S., & Afeni, T. B. (2010). Review of surface mine slope monitoring techniques. Journal of Mining Science, 46, 177-186.
[ 2 ] Afeni, T. B., & Cawood, F. T. (2013). Slope monitoring using total station: what are the challenges and how should these be mitigated?. South African Journal of Geomatics, 2(1), 41-53.
[ 3 ] Kane, W. F., & Beck, T. J. (2000). Instrumentation practice for slope monitoring. Engineering geology practice in Northern California. Association of engineering geologists Sacramento and San Francisco sections.
[ 4 ] Dowding, C. H., & O'Connor, K. M. (2000). Comparison of TDR and inclinometers for slope monitoring. In Geotechnical Measurements: Lab and Field (pp. 80-90).
[ 5 ] Eberhardt, E., Watson, A. D., & Loew, S. (2008). Improving the interpretation of slope monitoring and early warning data through better understanding of complex deep-seated landslide failure mechanisms. Landslides and Engineered Slopes. From the Past to the Future, Two Volumes+ CD-ROM, 61-74.
[ 6 ] Eberhardt, E., Watson, A. D., & Loew, S. (2008). Improving the interpretation of slope monitoring and early warning data through better understanding of complex deep-seated landslide failure mechanisms. Landslides and Engineered Slopes. From the Past to the Future, Two Volumes+ CD-ROM, 61-74.
[ 7 ] Cawood, FT & Stacey, T. R. (2006). Survey and geotechnical slope monitoring considerations. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 106(7), 495-501.
[ 8 ] Sheikh, M. R., Nakata, Y., Shitano, M., & Kaneko, M. (2021). Rainfall-induced unstable slope monitoring and early warning through tilt sensors. Soils and Foundations, 61(4), 1033-1053.
[ 9 ] Bery, A. A. (2016). Slope monitoring study using soil mechanics properties and 4-D electrical resistivity tomography methods. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 53(1), 24-29.
[ 10 ] Wang, J., Li, H., Jiang, Y., Tian, P., Cao, A., Long, Y., & Si, P. (2023). Slope monitoring optimization considering three-dimensional deformation and failure characteristics using the strength reduction method: A case study. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 4049.