ISSN: 2706-8862
Volume 11, Number 1 (2026)
Year Launched: 2016
Journal Menu
■ About The Journal
■ Aims & Scope
■ Editorial Board
■ Article Processing Charge
■ Archive

Resonance Absorption and Transverse Magnetization of a Ferrimagnetic Spin System Interacting with a Phonon Reservoir in the Spin-Wave Region

Volume 11, Issue 1, February 2026     |     PP. 88-133      |     PDF (2993 K)    |     Pub. Date: February 7, 2026
DOI: 10.54647/physics140714    15 Downloads     149 Views  

Author(s)

Mizuhiko SAEKI, Shimoasoushin-machi 859-40, Takaoka-shi, Toyama 939-1271, Japan

Abstract
A form of the transverse magnetic susceptibility is derived and the resonance absorption and transverse magnetization are discussed for a ferrimagnetic spin system interacting with a phonon reservoir in the spin-wave region, employing the TCLE method of linear response in terms of the non-equilibrium thermo-field dynamics (NETFD), which is formulated for the spin-phonon interaction taken to reflect the energy transfer between the ferrimagnetic system and phonon reservoir. Here, the TCLE method of linear response is a method in which the admittance of a physical system is directly derived from time-convolutionless equations with external driving terms.The approximate formulas of the resonance frequencies, peak-heights (heights of peak) and line half-widths in the resonance region of the power absorption and the amplitude of the expectation value of the transverse magnetization, which is referred as ``the magnetization-amplitude", are derived for the ferrimagnetic system in a transversely rotating magnetic-field. For an ferrimagnetic system of one-dimensional infinite spins in the transversely rotating magnetic-field, the power absorption and magnetization-amplitude are investigated numerically in the region valid for the lowest spin-wave approximation. The approximate formulas of the resonance frequencies, peak-heights and line half-widths, are shown to coincide well with the results investigated calculating numerically the analytic results of the power absorption and magnetization-amplitude in the resonance region, and also are shown to satisfy ``the narrowing condition" that as phonon reservoir is damped quickly, the peak-heights increase and the line half-widths decrease, and thus are verified numerically. In the resonance region of the power absorption and magnetization-amplitude, it is shown that as the temperature T becomes high, the resonance frequencies increase slightly, the peak-heights decrease and the line half-widths increase, and that as the wave number k becomes large, the resonance frequencies and peak-heights increase, and the line half-widths decrease. It is also shown that as the spin-magnitude S_1 or S_2 becomes large, the resonance frequencies of the power absorption and magnetization-amplitude become large, that as S_1 (> S_2) becomes large, the peak-heights of the power absorption and magnetization-amplitude increases, and that as S_2 (< S_1) becomes large, the peak-height of the magnetization-amplitude decreases though the one of the power absorption is mostly unchanged. Here, S_1 and S_2 are the magnitudes of spins at the up-spin sites and down-spin sites, respectively. The effects of the memory and initial correlation for the spin system and phonon reservoir, which are represented by the interference terms in the TCLE method and are referred as ``the interference effects", are confirmed to increase the power absorption and magnetization-amplitude in the resonance region, and are shown to produce effects that cannot be disregarded for the high temperature, for the non-quickly damped reservoir or for the small wave number k.

Keywords
Ferrimagnetic spin system; Resonance absorption; Transverse magnetization; Non-equilibrium thermo-field dynamics; The TCLE method of linear response; Spin-wave method

Cite this paper
Mizuhiko SAEKI, Resonance Absorption and Transverse Magnetization of a Ferrimagnetic Spin System Interacting with a Phonon Reservoir in the Spin-Wave Region , SCIREA Journal of Physics. Volume 11, Issue 1, February 2026 | PP. 88-133. 10.54647/physics140714

References

[ 1 ] C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 73 (1948), 155.
[ 2 ] J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 78 (1950), 266.
[ 3 ] T. Nagamiya, Progr. Theor. Phys. 6 (1951), 350.
[ 4 ] C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 82 (1951), 565.
[ 5 ] F. Keffer and C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 85 (1952), 329.
[ 6 ] T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940), 1098.
[ 7 ] T. Nakamura, Progr. Theor. Phys. 7 (1952), 539.
[ 8 ] J. M. Ziman, Proc. Phys. Soc. 65 (1952), 540.
[ 9 ] R. Kubo, Phys. Rev. 87 (1952), 568.
[ 10 ] A. I. Akhiezer, V. G. Bar’yakhtar and M. I. Kaganov, Sov. Phys. Usp. 3 (1961), 567, 661.
[ 11 ] T. Oguchi and A. Honma, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 16 (1961), 79.
[ 12 ] H. Mori and K. Kawasaki, Progr. Theor. Phys. 27 (1962), 529.
[ 13 ] H. Mori and K. Kawasaki, Progr. Theor. Phys. 27 (1962), 971.
[ 14 ] S. Miyashita, T. Yoshino and A. Ogasahara, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 68 (1999), 655.
[ 15 ] A. Ogasahara and S. Miyashita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 69 (2000), 4043.
[ 16 ] A. Ogasahara and S. Miyashita, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 145 (2002), 286.
[ 17 ] A. Ogasahara and S. Miyashita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn Suppl. B 72 (2003), 44.
[ 18 ] M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999), 5136.
[ 19 ] M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002), 134410; 76 (2007), 109901 [erratum].
[ 20 ] M. Saeki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 121 (2009), 165.
[ 21 ] M. Saeki, Physica A 390 (2011), 1884.
[ 22 ] M. Saeki, SCIREA Journal of Physics Vol. 10 Issue 6, (Dec. 2025), PP. 267-302.
[ 23 ] M. Saeki, Recent Research Developments in Physics, Vol. 4 (Transworld Research Network, India, 2003), pp. 73-96.
[ 24 ] M. Saeki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 114 (2005), 907.
[ 25 ] M. Saeki, Physica A 387, 1827 (2008).
[ 26 ] M. Saeki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 124 (2010), 95.
[ 27 ] M. Saeki, Physica A 389, 3720 (2010).
[ 28 ] T. Arimitsu and H. Umezawa, Progr. Theor. Phys. 74 (1985), 429.
[ 29 ] T. Arimitsu and H. Umezawa, Progr. Theor. Phys. 77 (1987), 32.
[ 30 ] T. Arimitsu and H. Umezawa, Progr. Theor. Phys. 77 (1987), 53.
[ 31 ] M. Saeki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 67 (1982), 1313.
[ 32 ] M. Saeki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55 (1986), 1846.
[ 33 ] M. Saeki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 79 (1988), 396.
[ 34 ] M. Saeki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 89 (1993), 607.
[ 35 ] M. Saeki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68 (1999), 3831.
[ 36 ] M. Saeki, C. Uchiyama, T. Mori and S. Miyashita, Phys. Rev. E 81 (2010), 031131.
[ 37 ] C. Uchiyama, M. Aihara, M. Saeki and S. Miyashita, Phys. Rev. E 80 (2009), 021128.
[ 38 ] R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 12 (1957), 570.
[ 39 ] M. Saeki and S. Miyashita, Physica A 446 (2016), 272.
[ 40 ] M. Saeki, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021 (2021), 113I01.
[ 41 ] M. Saeki, SCIREA Journal of Physics Vol. 11 Issue 1, (Feb. 2026), PP. 42-87.
[ 42 ] L. van Hove, Physica 23 (1957), 441.
[ 43 ] R. Kubo, in Tokei Butsurigaku, eds. M. Toda and R. Kubo (Iwanami, Tokyo, 1978), 2nd ed., Chapter 6 [in Japanese] ; trans. Statistical Physics II, eds. R. Kubo, M. Toda and N. Hashitsume (Springer, Berlin, 1978).
[ 44 ] M. Saeki, Progr. Theor. Phys. 98 (1997), 1025.
[ 45 ] M. Saeki, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 69 (2000), 1327.
[ 46 ] S. K. Pati, S. Ramasesha and D. Sen, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997), 8894.
[ 47 ] S. Brehmer, H. J. Mikeska and S. Yamamoto, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 9 (1997), 3921.
[ 48 ] S. Yamanoto and T. Fukui, Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998), 14008.
[ 49 ] S. Yamanoto, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999), 1024.
[ 50 ] L. Neel, Ann. de Phys. 11 (1936), 232.
[ 51 ] F. Shibata, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 49, 15 (1980).
[ 52 ] M. Asou and F. Shibata, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 50 (1981), 1846.
[ 53 ] M. Asou and F. Shibata, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 50 (1981), 2481.
[ 54 ] N. Hashitsume, F. Shibata and M. Shingu, J. Stat. Phys. 17 (1977), 155.
[ 55 ] S. Fujita, J. Math. Phys. 6 (1965), 1877.